Difference between revisions of "David Allen Green"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (better cat) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[File:David-Allen-Green.jpg|thumbnail|200px|David Allen Green wrote: "Can [[Richard Dawkins]] still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]</ref> ]] | ||
'''David Allen Green''' is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the ''New Statesman'' and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a [[Philosophical skepticism|skeptic]] who helps run Westminster Skeptics.<ref name="DAF06July2011">[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref> | '''David Allen Green''' is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the ''New Statesman'' and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a [[Philosophical skepticism|skeptic]] who helps run Westminster Skeptics.<ref name="DAF06July2011">[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 14:46, June 22, 2015
David Allen Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."[1]
David Allen Green is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the New Statesman and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a skeptic who helps run Westminster Skeptics.[2]
Commentary on Richard Dawkins
Commenting on Elevatorgate, a scandal involving Richard Dawkins, Green said he believed Dawkins was a sexist.[2] In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."[2]