Difference between revisions of "Game theory primary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(A total of 17 candidates (as of August 2015) vie for support, which requires considerations of game theory before criticizing rivals.) |
(Only two of the 17 candidates have been initially willing to criticize Donald Trump, lest they lost potential support among supporters of Trump. Those two candidates are Rand Paul and Rick Perry.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Game theory]] becomes an important considering in a crowded primary, such as the Republican nominating process for the [[2016 presidential election]]. A total of 17 candidates (as of August 2015) vie for support, which requires considerations of game theory before criticizing rivals. | [[Game theory]] becomes an important considering in a crowded primary, such as the Republican nominating process for the [[2016 presidential election]]. A total of 17 candidates (as of August 2015) vie for support, which requires considerations of game theory before criticizing rivals. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Only two of the 17 candidates have been initially willing to criticize [[Donald Trump]], lest they lost potential support among supporters of Trump. Those two candidates are [[Rand Paul]] and [[Rick Perry]]. | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
[[category:2016 presidential election]] | [[category:2016 presidential election]] | ||
Revision as of 19:12, August 10, 2015
Game theory becomes an important considering in a crowded primary, such as the Republican nominating process for the 2016 presidential election. A total of 17 candidates (as of August 2015) vie for support, which requires considerations of game theory before criticizing rivals.
Only two of the 17 candidates have been initially willing to criticize Donald Trump, lest they lost potential support among supporters of Trump. Those two candidates are Rand Paul and Rick Perry.