Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎Wow: reply)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
Conservapedia has 38 sections on this topic, Wikipedia only has 13 sections on religion. Talk about paranoia. It must be difficult to accept that atheism is a lack of belief in gods and supernatural things. You should let atheists define the word. Don't quote the definition from a few select sources, include secular sources and see what the most used definition is.
 
Conservapedia has 38 sections on this topic, Wikipedia only has 13 sections on religion. Talk about paranoia. It must be difficult to accept that atheism is a lack of belief in gods and supernatural things. You should let atheists define the word. Don't quote the definition from a few select sources, include secular sources and see what the most used definition is.
 +
 +
:LOL, that definition didn't originate until the 1970s.  It's not Conservapedia's job to cater to the changes in the meaning of words that atheists, through each periodic and regular "atheist makeover", want to produce. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 10:43, 28 December 2015 (EST)
  
 
== New Book ==
 
== New Book ==

Revision as of 15:43, December 28, 2015

List of Archives

Wow

Conservapedia has 38 sections on this topic, Wikipedia only has 13 sections on religion. Talk about paranoia. It must be difficult to accept that atheism is a lack of belief in gods and supernatural things. You should let atheists define the word. Don't quote the definition from a few select sources, include secular sources and see what the most used definition is.

LOL, that definition didn't originate until the 1970s. It's not Conservapedia's job to cater to the changes in the meaning of words that atheists, through each periodic and regular "atheist makeover", want to produce. VargasMilan (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2015 (EST)

New Book

The editors of this page may be interested in a new book entitled The Triumph of Faith by Rodney Stark. The book relies on the Gallup (the real Gallup, not Gallup International) World Polls as well as other resources to show that the world is more religious now than ever. I know this page is specific to atheism but I thought more people might see this post if I put it here. Anyway, here's a link about the book: http://www.baylorisr.org/2015/10/19/baptist-standard-book-review-isrs-starkthe-triumph-of-faith/

The article says that the book will be published November 16th, but Amazon says you can digitally download the book on the 3rd.

Great article, keep it up! (unsigned contribution by TBarnes).

Thanks for the book recommendation TBarnes. Stark does quality work and I did not hear about this latest book of his. Conservative (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2015 (EDT)
TBarnes, I found a summary of Stark's book http://www.movements.net/2015/11/03/rodney-starks-next-book-the-global-religious-awakening.html plus I found this at Google Books: The Triumph of Faith by Rodney Stark - Google Books
Thanks again for telling me about this book. I plan on reading it. Conservative (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2015 (EST)
You're welcome (unsigned contribution by TBarnes).

Thought this was funny...

http://www.google.com/trends/explore?hl=en-US#q=atheist%2C%20ear%20wax&geo=US&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B4

Thanks for that little chuckle. It happens that I've been ribbing Cons over all his atheism articles, suggesting "atheism and maple syrup" and "atheism and rocking chairs" as topics that he hasn't yet written about. Well, Cons is quite a wit, and he actually came back with some observations on these topics. See [1] and [2]. But he hasn't yet written articles on those topics. SamHB (talk) 12:04, 4 December 2015 (EST)

Christian Growth in China

Here's a good article on Christianity's growth in supposedly atheist China...http://globalplus.thearda.com/globalplus-religion-in-china/ TX Digger