134
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 12:
Line 12: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Quality (view source)
Revision as of 01:07, April 21, 2007
, 01:07, April 21, 2007no edit summary
The CreationWiki article is the work of exactly two contributors, [http://creationwiki.org/index.php?title=Biblical_criticism&action=history Tsommer and Temlakos]. The Conservapedia article is by TerryH. The Conservapedia article is almost identical to the last revision by Temlakos and does not seem to include recent changes by Tsommer, so very likely TerryH is Temlakos and this is a dual submission. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:18, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
The CreationWiki article is the work of exactly two contributors, [http://creationwiki.org/index.php?title=Biblical_criticism&action=history Tsommer and Temlakos]. The Conservapedia article is by TerryH. The Conservapedia article is almost identical to the last revision by Temlakos and does not seem to include recent changes by Tsommer, so very likely TerryH is Temlakos and this is a dual submission. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:18, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
== I question the methodology of the study ==
How were the "random" articles choosen? Random page link? If I preform the same thing, with say 20 random page links I get a WHOLE lot of rubbish, nothing approaching 50 percent "good" I think this wasn't truly random. [[User:Etaroced|Etaroced]] 21:07, 20 April 2007 (EDT)