Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bestiality and Germany"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:See: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality#The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality|The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality#Belief in evolution and sexual immorality|Belief in evolution and sexual immorality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] | :See: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality#The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality|The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality#Belief in evolution and sexual immorality|Belief in evolution and sexual immorality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] | ||
| − | :Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST) | + | :Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality when asked about it, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:31, February 16, 2016
How is evolutionary belief related to bestiality?--JoeyJ (talk) 12:24, 16 February 2016 (EST)
- See: The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality and Belief in evolution and sexual immorality and Evolutionary belief and bestiality
- Question: There are Darwinists who are promoting/condoning and not condemning bestiality when asked about it, but there are no biblical creationists doing so. Why is that? Conservative (talk) 12:39, 16 February 2016 (EST)