Difference between revisions of "Universal negative"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Notes: clean up & uniformity)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In [[logic]], a '''universal negative''' is a proposition of the form “No S is P.” Symbol: E, e.<ref>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/universal+negative Universal negative]</ref>
 
In [[logic]], a '''universal negative''' is a proposition of the form “No S is P.” Symbol: E, e.<ref>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/universal+negative Universal negative]</ref>
  
An example of a valid universal negative is "No triangles have 4 sides".  This is a valid universal negative because if something does not have 3 sides, it cannot be a triangle.<ref>[http://blog.faithbeyondbelief.ca/2014/08/the-universal-negative-can-it-be-proven.html A universal negative: Can it be proven?]</ref>
+
An example of a valid universal negative is "No triangles have four sides".  This is a valid universal negative because if something does not have three sides, it cannot be a triangle.
  
== External links ==
+
== The universal negative claim by atheists that God does not exist ==
  
*[http://blog.faithbeyondbelief.ca/2014/08/the-universal-negative-can-it-be-proven.html A universal negative: Can it be proven?]
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and arrogance]]
 +
 
 +
Contrary to the mistaken notion of individuals who are inexperienced in [[logic]]/[[philosophy]], there are plenty of cases where universal negatives can be proven.<ref>[http://blog.faithbeyondbelief.ca/2014/08/the-universal-negative-can-it-be-proven.html A universal negative: Can it be proven?]</ref>  However, [[atheism|atheists]]' universal negative claim that God does not exist is not a reasonable universal negative claim.<ref>[http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive] by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Please see: [http://blog.faithbeyondbelief.ca/2014/08/the-universal-negative-can-it-be-proven.html A universal negative: Can it be proven?] and [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html Putting the Atheist on the Defensive]
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
[[Category: Logic]]
+
[[Category:Logic]]

Latest revision as of 21:11, July 13, 2016

In logic, a universal negative is a proposition of the form “No S is P.” Symbol: E, e.[1]

An example of a valid universal negative is "No triangles have four sides". This is a valid universal negative because if something does not have three sides, it cannot be a triangle.

The universal negative claim by atheists that God does not exist

See also: Atheism and arrogance

Contrary to the mistaken notion of individuals who are inexperienced in logic/philosophy, there are plenty of cases where universal negatives can be proven.[2] However, atheists' universal negative claim that God does not exist is not a reasonable universal negative claim.[3]

Please see: A universal negative: Can it be proven? and Putting the Atheist on the Defensive

Notes

  1. Universal negative
  2. A universal negative: Can it be proven?
  3. Putting the Atheist on the Defensive by Kenneth R. Samples, Christian Research Institute Journal, Fall 1991, and Winter 1992, page 7.