Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ozone layer"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (tweak)
(ozone "hole")
Line 1: Line 1:
−
UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning.  UVC is the weakest, UVA is s little stronger, and UVC is the strongest.  Does the ozone layer really only block UVB?  UVB can be blocked by a sheet of paper, so I expect the ozone does more than that.  Does anyone know?
+
UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning.  UVC is the weakest, UVA is s little stronger, and UVC is the strongest.  Does the ozone layer really only block UVB?  UVB can be blocked by a sheet of paper, so I expect the ozone does more than that.  Does anyone know?<br />
 +
Also, I remember somewhere seeing a graphic of the ozone "hole," which actually included the scale.  As I recall, the "hole" was only about 60% of known ozone concentration.  Does anyone know where more information on this can be found? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 17:43, 8 March 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 22:43, March 8, 2017

UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning. UVC is the weakest, UVA is s little stronger, and UVC is the strongest. Does the ozone layer really only block UVB? UVB can be blocked by a sheet of paper, so I expect the ozone does more than that. Does anyone know?
Also, I remember somewhere seeing a graphic of the ozone "hole," which actually included the scale. As I recall, the "hole" was only about 60% of known ozone concentration. Does anyone know where more information on this can be found? --David B (TALK) 17:43, 8 March 2017 (EST)