Difference between revisions of "Talk:Barack Obama Controversies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "As we discuused at Main Page talk, the wiretapping is legal. Heck, Obama could've droned Trump legally. I would suggest for the subheading, "domestic spying controvercy". ~~~~") |
(I changed it to "Wiretapping the 2016 election.") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
As we discuused at Main Page talk, the wiretapping is legal. Heck, Obama could've droned Trump legally. I would suggest for the subheading, "domestic spying controvercy". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 1]]</sup> 09:12, 13 March 2017 (EDT) | As we discuused at Main Page talk, the wiretapping is legal. Heck, Obama could've droned Trump legally. I would suggest for the subheading, "domestic spying controvercy". [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 1]]</sup> 09:12, 13 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I changed it to "Wiretapping the 2016 election." [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 15:10, 13 March 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:10, March 13, 2017
As we discuused at Main Page talk, the wiretapping is legal. Heck, Obama could've droned Trump legally. I would suggest for the subheading, "domestic spying controvercy". RobSCIA v Trump updated score:CIA 3, Trump 1 09:12, 13 March 2017 (EDT)