Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ozone layer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(ozone "hole") |
m (whoops) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning. | + | UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning. UVB is the weakest, UVA is s little stronger, and UVC is the strongest. Does the ozone layer really only block UVB? UVB can be blocked by a sheet of paper, so I expect the ozone does more than that. Does anyone know?<br /> |
Also, I remember somewhere seeing a graphic of the ozone "hole," which actually included the scale. As I recall, the "hole" was only about 60% of known ozone concentration. Does anyone know where more information on this can be found? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 17:43, 8 March 2017 (EST) | Also, I remember somewhere seeing a graphic of the ozone "hole," which actually included the scale. As I recall, the "hole" was only about 60% of known ozone concentration. Does anyone know where more information on this can be found? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 17:43, 8 March 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:36, March 20, 2017
UVA causes sunburn and tan, UVB causes surface skin damage and tan, and UVC cuts right through most protections (clothing, sun block, etc. and damages sub-dermal tissue and DNA, without causing tanning. UVB is the weakest, UVA is s little stronger, and UVC is the strongest. Does the ozone layer really only block UVB? UVB can be blocked by a sheet of paper, so I expect the ozone does more than that. Does anyone know?
Also, I remember somewhere seeing a graphic of the ozone "hole," which actually included the scale. As I recall, the "hole" was only about 60% of known ozone concentration. Does anyone know where more information on this can be found? --David B (TALK) 17:43, 8 March 2017 (EST)