Difference between revisions of "Senate rules change"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎See also: add another link to analysis)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
*[[Lindsey Graham]] of South Carolina (member of prior "gang of 14: that averted a rules change)
 
*[[Lindsey Graham]] of South Carolina (member of prior "gang of 14: that averted a rules change)
 
*[[Rand Paul]] of Kentucky
 
*[[Rand Paul]] of Kentucky
 +
*[[Rob Portman]] of Ohio
 +
*[[John Thune]] of South Dakota
 
*[[Johnny Isakson]] of Georgia (recovering from back surgery, so an absence or delay is possible)
 
*[[Johnny Isakson]] of Georgia (recovering from back surgery, so an absence or delay is possible)
 
(add to list)
 
(add to list)

Revision as of 22:33, April 2, 2017

The Senate rules change, also called the "nuclear option," would eliminate the filibuster in the U.S. Senate for confirming nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell has promised to do this if, as expected, the Democrats successfully filibuster nominee Neil Gorsuch in early April 2017.

Republicans need 50 votes to accomplish the rules change, assuming Vice-President Mike Pence breaks the tie in favor of changing the rules. This means the Republicans lose no more than two Republicans on this issue. Doubtful Republican votes with respect to changing the rules include:

Most likely to vote "no" on rules change

Possibly "no" on rules change

Outside possibility of "no" or absence

(add to list)

See also