Difference between revisions of "Think tank"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''think tank''' is typically a [[public policy]] institute, dedicated to finding facts about, and thereby advancing, a particular theory or policy. An example is the Cato Institute, a [[libertarian]] institution which occasionally contributes positively to [[conservative]] viewpoints. | A '''think tank''' is typically a [[public policy]] institute, dedicated to finding facts about, and thereby advancing, a particular theory or policy. An example is the Cato Institute, a [[libertarian]] institution which occasionally contributes positively to [[conservative]] viewpoints. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Heritage Foundation]] is a pro-[[free trade]] think tank located near [[Union Station]] in [[D.C.]], which raises substantial donations from [[China]]. In 2016 Heritage promoted [[pro-choice]] nominees for [[Donald Trump]] to choose from in picking someone for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[Federalist Society]] is a predominantly [[pro-choice]] think tank that has repeatedly given advice to Republican presidents which has prevented [[pro-life]] judicial nominees from being selected for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] and elsewhere on the federal bench. | ||
* [[Conservative think tanks]] | * [[Conservative think tanks]] | ||
Revision as of 21:50, April 28, 2017
A think tank is typically a public policy institute, dedicated to finding facts about, and thereby advancing, a particular theory or policy. An example is the Cato Institute, a libertarian institution which occasionally contributes positively to conservative viewpoints.
The Heritage Foundation is a pro-free trade think tank located near Union Station in D.C., which raises substantial donations from China. In 2016 Heritage promoted pro-choice nominees for Donald Trump to choose from in picking someone for the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Federalist Society is a predominantly pro-choice think tank that has repeatedly given advice to Republican presidents which has prevented pro-life judicial nominees from being selected for the U.S. Supreme Court and elsewhere on the federal bench.