Difference between revisions of "Essay:Bias of Science"
From Conservapedia
m (a start) |
m (sort) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable. The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable. Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to any of the four fundamental forces of nature. | Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable. The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable. Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to any of the four fundamental forces of nature. | ||
[[Category:Essays]] | [[Category:Essays]] | ||
| + | {{DEFAULTSORT:Bias of Science}} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:36, May 18, 2017
Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable. The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable. Physics fully recognizes the truth of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, despite its lack of any connection to any of the four fundamental forces of nature.
