Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pink News"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(sure, as long at it's clean)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Would there me any point in creating a page about it in order to point out its many inaccuracies? It specializes in sly misrepresentation, occasionally lurching into sheer libel, and its comments pages are full of messages that give an unfavorable impression of the people who read it. --Unsigned comment by User:GraceDalrymple
 
Would there me any point in creating a page about it in order to point out its many inaccuracies? It specializes in sly misrepresentation, occasionally lurching into sheer libel, and its comments pages are full of messages that give an unfavorable impression of the people who read it. --Unsigned comment by User:GraceDalrymple
 
:As long as it does not violate CP's [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandments]] and [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|guidelines]] and is well-sourced (CP Commandment #2), I see no problem with doing it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:15, 16 September 2017 (EDT)
 
:As long as it does not violate CP's [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandments]] and [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|guidelines]] and is well-sourced (CP Commandment #2), I see no problem with doing it. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:15, 16 September 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Just please try to keep it clean and family-friendly, and I don't see why not! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:30, 16 September 2017 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:30, September 16, 2017

Pink News is a very aggressively LGBT online publication. Would there me any point in creating a page about it in order to point out its many inaccuracies? It specializes in sly misrepresentation, occasionally lurching into sheer libel, and its comments pages are full of messages that give an unfavorable impression of the people who read it. --Unsigned comment by User:GraceDalrymple

As long as it does not violate CP's commandments and guidelines and is well-sourced (CP Commandment #2), I see no problem with doing it. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2017 (EDT)
Just please try to keep it clean and family-friendly, and I don't see why not! --David B (TALK) 19:30, 16 September 2017 (EDT)