Difference between revisions of "Essay: Conservapedia's atheism article"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles == | == A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles == | ||
| − | [[File:Union jack.jpg|thumbnail|280px| | + | [[File:Union jack.jpg|thumbnail|280px|right|The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:EJamesW User: EJamesW talk page]</ref> ]] |
| + | Below are two quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is an editor at Conservapedia: | ||
| − | An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on | + | '''1.''' The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's [[atheism]] related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:EJamesW User: EJamesW talk page]</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | '''2.''' An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism: | ||
A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?" | A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?" | ||
EJamesW: "No."<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:EJamesW User: EJamesW talk page]</ref> | EJamesW: "No."<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:EJamesW User: EJamesW talk page]</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 06:17, November 2, 2017
2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's atheism article taken from a forum thread (the first four posts on the thread):
1. First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is: http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism"
2. Second person: "Sounds reasonable."
3. Third Person: "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.
4. Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."
Source: Thread: Conservapedia article on Atheism: http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?59257-Conservapedia-article-on-Atheism
A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles
Below are two quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is an editor at Conservapedia:
1. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[2]
2. An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism:
A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?"
EJamesW: "No."[3]