Difference between revisions of "Essay: Conservapedia's atheism article"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
'''1.''' First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:
 
'''1.''' First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:
−
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism"
 
  
−
'''2.''' Second person: "Sounds reasonable."
+
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism"<ref name="Forum"/>[http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?59257-Conservapedia-article-on-Atheism Thread: Conservapedia article on Atheism]</ref>
  
−
'''3.''' Third Person:  "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.  
+
'''2.''' Second person: "Sounds reasonable."<ref name="Forum"/>
 +
 
 +
'''3.''' Third Person:  "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.<ref name="Forum"/>
 +
 
 +
'''4.''' Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."<ref name="Forum"/>
  
−
'''4.''' Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."
 
  
−
Source: Thread: Conservapedia article on Atheism: http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?59257-Conservapedia-article-on-Atheism
 
 
== A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles ==
 
== A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles ==
  

Revision as of 06:29, November 2, 2017

2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's atheism article taken from a forum thread (the first four posts on the thread):

1. First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism"[1]Thread: Conservapedia article on Atheism</ref>

2. Second person: "Sounds reasonable."[1]

3. Third Person: "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.[1]

4. Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."[1]


A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles

The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[2]

Below are two 2015 quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is former editor at Conservapedia.

1. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[3]

2. An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism:

A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?"

EJamesW: "No."[4]

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Forum
  2. ↑ User: EJamesW talk page
  3. ↑ User: EJamesW talk page
  4. ↑ User: EJamesW talk page