Difference between revisions of "Essay: Conservapedia's atheism article"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''4.''' Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."<ref name="Forum"/> | '''4.''' Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."<ref name="Forum"/> | ||
| − | |||
== A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles == | == A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles == | ||
Revision as of 06:34, November 2, 2017
2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's atheism article taken from a forum thread (the first four posts on the thread):
1. First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism".[1]
2. Second person: "Sounds reasonable."[1]
3. Third Person: "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.[1]
4. Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."[1]
A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles
Below are two 2015 quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is former editor at Conservapedia.
1. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[3]
2. An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism:
A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?"
EJamesW: "No."[4]