Difference between revisions of "Essay: Conservapedia's atheism article"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's [[atheism]] article taken from a forum thread (the first four posts on the thread):
+
2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's [[atheism]] article taken from a forum thread on the website Absolutewrite.com  (the first four posts on the thread):
  
 
'''1.''' First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:
 
'''1.''' First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:

Revision as of 06:37, November 2, 2017

2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's atheism article taken from a forum thread on the website Absolutewrite.com (the first four posts on the thread):

1. First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism".[1]

2. Second person: "Sounds reasonable."[1]

3. Third Person: "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.[1]

4. Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."[1]

A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles

The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[2]

Below are two 2015 quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is former editor at Conservapedia.

1. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[3]

2. An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism:

A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?"

EJamesW: "No."[4]

Notes