Difference between revisions of "Essay: Conservapedia's atheism article"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
EJamesW: "No."<ref name="EJamesW"/>
 
EJamesW: "No."<ref name="EJamesW"/>
−
 
−
== YouTube videos on Conservapedia's atheism article ==
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3paAT8AO2Gk Viral article deals major blow to atheism]
 
−
 
−
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgMcwg6NzrI Best source for scientific info on Atheism: Conservapedia]
 
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==

Revision as of 07:08, November 2, 2017

According the website Absolute Write, "Absolute Write is a comprehensive informational Website and community for writers of all levels."[1]

A 2007 public commentary on Conservapedia's atheism article taken from a forum thread on the website Absolutewrite.com (the first four posts on the thread):

1. First person: "Offhand I didn't see anything incorrect with this, and am surprised at how accurate it is:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism".[2]

2. Second person: "Sounds reasonable."[2]

3. Third Person: "I'd have to agree -- nothing really pops out at me either, at least on the Atheism page.[2]

4. Fourth person: "Wow, that was amazingly accurate and very fair."[2]

A British atheist on Conservapedia's atheism articles

The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[3]

Below are two 2015 quotes of the British atheist EJamesW who is former editor at Conservapedia.

1. The British atheist EJamesW on Conservapedia's atheism related articles: "...they're very detailed, thorough and have lots of quotes and citations."[3]

2. An exchange betwwen the British atheist EJamesW and an evangelical Christian who helped create Conservapedia's articles on atheism:

A Christian editor using the User: Conservative account: "Have you ever once shown that an iota of the material posted on atheism by the User: Conservative account is an error?"

EJamesW: "No."[3]

Notes