Difference between revisions of "Talk:Devin Patrick Kelley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Mental health issues: new section) |
(→Mental health issues: "mental illness" blocks) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The MSM (AP) is now reporting he had mental health issues (duh!) and was institutionalized for a while. [http://www.wptv.com/news/world/texas-church-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley-previously-committed-to-mental-health-facility] --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 15:09, 7 November 2017 (EST) | The MSM (AP) is now reporting he had mental health issues (duh!) and was institutionalized for a while. [http://www.wptv.com/news/world/texas-church-gunman-devin-patrick-kelley-previously-committed-to-mental-health-facility] --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 15:09, 7 November 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | :The problem here is that this may prompt another push for blocking "mentally unstable" people from purchasing firearms. Of course, this sounds logical until you consider that: | ||
| + | :#This is still a violation of the second amendment right | ||
| + | :#"mentally unstable" according to who? Those who believe in a God who "obviously doesn't exist" could be defined as mentally unstable, for example. | ||
| + | :And here I am preaching to the choir again... --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 16:07, 7 November 2017 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:07, November 7, 2017
I deleted the material relating to Wikipedia. We have an article on bias in Wikipedia for that. In addition I looked at one of Wikipedia's sources and it was so vague that it is hard to either confirm or deny that some right-wing websites were doing as they say. I just don't think the section is very relevant to the incident. Conservative (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2017 (EST)
Mental health issues
The MSM (AP) is now reporting he had mental health issues (duh!) and was institutionalized for a while. [1] --David B (TALK) 15:09, 7 November 2017 (EST)
- The problem here is that this may prompt another push for blocking "mentally unstable" people from purchasing firearms. Of course, this sounds logical until you consider that:
- This is still a violation of the second amendment right
- "mentally unstable" according to who? Those who believe in a God who "obviously doesn't exist" could be defined as mentally unstable, for example.
- And here I am preaching to the choir again... --David B (TALK) 16:07, 7 November 2017 (EST)