Difference between revisions of "Jevons's rule of logic"
From Conservapedia
m (wikilinks (was dead-end)) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) m (→top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|pages=60 | |pages=60 | ||
|isbn=978-0-89051-597-6 | |isbn=978-0-89051-597-6 | ||
| − | |url= | + | |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gvyHquVubDoC}}</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Epistemology]] | [[Category:Epistemology]] | ||
[[Category:Methodology of Science]] | [[Category:Methodology of Science]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Philosophy of | + | [[Category:Philosophy of Science]] |
Latest revision as of 17:47, September 26, 2018
Jevons's rule of logic or Jevons's elementary rule of logic, stated in Latin as flasa in uno falsa in omnibus, is simply expressing the obvious that a single absolute conflict between fact and hypothesis is fatal to the hypothesis. It is named after W. Stanley Jevons, who articulated this rule in his book The principles of science – A Treatise on Logic and the Scientific Method.[1]
References
- ↑ Randal Hedtke (1983, 2010). Secrets of the Sixth Edition. Master Books, 60. ISBN 978-0-89051-597-6.
