Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rightpedia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Personally, I think the Michael Coombs/SPLC criticisms should go back in. CP should not be seen in any way as covering up or protecting Coombs, the SPLC, or Rightpedia from cr...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Personally, I think the Michael Coombs/SPLC criticisms should go back in. CP should not be seen in any way as covering up or protecting Coombs, the SPLC, or Rightpedia from criticism. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:46, 31 October 2018 (EDT)
 
Personally, I think the Michael Coombs/SPLC criticisms should go back in. CP should not be seen in any way as covering up or protecting Coombs, the SPLC, or Rightpedia from criticism. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 23:46, 31 October 2018 (EDT)
 +
:Is there a source other than the SPLC that we can cite for that? --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:52, 31 October 2018 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:52, November 1, 2018

Personally, I think the Michael Coombs/SPLC criticisms should go back in. CP should not be seen in any way as covering up or protecting Coombs, the SPLC, or Rightpedia from criticism. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 23:46, 31 October 2018 (EDT)

Is there a source other than the SPLC that we can cite for that? --1990'sguy (talk) 23:52, 31 October 2018 (EDT)