Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Richard Dawkins and anger== | ==Richard Dawkins and anger== | ||
Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
| − | : | + | :These are two separate issues. As can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=richard+dawkins+and+anger&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS771US771&oq=richard+dawkins+and+anger&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2.6014j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 HERE], Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | Plus, it is not worth the trouble. He is far, far less influential post [[Elevatorgate]] (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:11, 9 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:35, May 9, 2019
Richard Dawkins and anger
Just a suggestion, but should the article Richard Dawkins and anger be merged with this one? Carltonio (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
- These are two separate issues. As can be seen HERE, Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.Conservative (talk) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
Plus, it is not worth the trouble. He is far, far less influential post Elevatorgate (see: Richard Dawkins' loss of influence).Conservative (talk) 12:11, 9 May 2019 (EDT)