Difference between revisions of "Talk:Segregation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(CP shouldn't adopt a pro-forced busing standpoint.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Busing section could be spun-out into a separate [[Busing]] article if need be; during the first Democrat 2020 presidential debate "busing" was the number one Google search term. A lot of voters have no idea what it is/was. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 20:43, 28 June 2019 (EDT) | The Busing section could be spun-out into a separate [[Busing]] article if need be; during the first Democrat 2020 presidential debate "busing" was the number one Google search term. A lot of voters have no idea what it is/was. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 20:43, 28 June 2019 (EDT) | ||
:I strongly oppose this article's pro-busing stance. It may be nice to score political points against Biden, but that doesn't change the fact that forced busing failed as a policy and caused much resentment among otherwise reasonable and un-bigoted people. CP should '''not''' adopt a pro-forced busing standpoint. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:54, 28 June 2019 (EDT) | :I strongly oppose this article's pro-busing stance. It may be nice to score political points against Biden, but that doesn't change the fact that forced busing failed as a policy and caused much resentment among otherwise reasonable and un-bigoted people. CP should '''not''' adopt a pro-forced busing standpoint. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:54, 28 June 2019 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::It's not a standpoint. It's a record of the history. If you feel facts are miscolored, propose alternative language. The facts are stated pretty clearly, IMO, without undo editorial bias. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:04, 29 June 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:04, June 29, 2019
The Busing section could be spun-out into a separate Busing article if need be; during the first Democrat 2020 presidential debate "busing" was the number one Google search term. A lot of voters have no idea what it is/was. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 20:43, 28 June 2019 (EDT)
- I strongly oppose this article's pro-busing stance. It may be nice to score political points against Biden, but that doesn't change the fact that forced busing failed as a policy and caused much resentment among otherwise reasonable and un-bigoted people. CP should not adopt a pro-forced busing standpoint. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2019 (EDT)
- It's not a standpoint. It's a record of the history. If you feel facts are miscolored, propose alternative language. The facts are stated pretty clearly, IMO, without undo editorial bias. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 00:04, 29 June 2019 (EDT)