Difference between revisions of "Ante-Nicene Fathers"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(statement re Ante-Nicene Fathers as subject of controversy within Christianity was followed only by statement of the contention of supporters. I added a balancing statement re view of critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, liberals)
(copied last paragraph from article Council of Nicaea that there is no evidence that Constantine dictated doctrine to the Council nor any syncretism evident in the 20 canons of the Council to accommodate pagan beliefs, Roman or Greek or Babylonian.)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, Christian liberals and atheists contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent a radical corruption of pure Christian doctrine as evidence of the beginning of a Great Apostasy immediately after the death of the last Apostles and the completion of the New Testament, by [[syncretism]] with pagan Greek and Roman philosophies, and culminating in the 4th century invention of the pseudo-Christian-Pagan Catholic Church mandated by Roman Emperor [[Constantine]] at the [[Council of Nicaea]], immediately followed by the persecution of true Christians as heretics. Evidence of this corruption and apostasy is seen by Protestant and Fundamentalist apologists in the evident contrast of the "Catholic doctrines" in the Ante-Nicene Fathers with "the pure doctrines of New Testament Christianity rediscovered by the leaders of the [[Protestant Reformation]]."
 
Critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, Christian liberals and atheists contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent a radical corruption of pure Christian doctrine as evidence of the beginning of a Great Apostasy immediately after the death of the last Apostles and the completion of the New Testament, by [[syncretism]] with pagan Greek and Roman philosophies, and culminating in the 4th century invention of the pseudo-Christian-Pagan Catholic Church mandated by Roman Emperor [[Constantine]] at the [[Council of Nicaea]], immediately followed by the persecution of true Christians as heretics. Evidence of this corruption and apostasy is seen by Protestant and Fundamentalist apologists in the evident contrast of the "Catholic doctrines" in the Ante-Nicene Fathers with "the pure doctrines of New Testament Christianity rediscovered by the leaders of the [[Protestant Reformation]]."
 +
 +
The 20 Canons of the Council of Nicaea demonstrate absolutely no [[Syncretism|syncretistic]] compromise with pagan religion, as some have charged.<ref>See [http://www.christian-history.org/council-of-nicea-canons.html The Canons of the Council of Nicaea (christian-history.org)] ''The commentary by the author rejects and even condemns outright some of the canons as being Catholic, sinful, and opposed to the Bible, but most significantly he says nothing about any pagan religious beliefs being evident in any of them.''</ref> There is no evidence in any [[Exegesis|readings]] of the texts of the documents of the Council of Nicaea to support the charge that the emperor [[Constantine]] dictated to the council of bishops any change in doctrinal teaching or that he decreed or mandated any revision in any definition of Christian terms to accommodate any pagan beliefs, Roman or Greek or Babylonian.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 18:07, September 6, 2019

The Ante-Nicene Fathers are those early Church fathers (and their associated writings) from the beginning of Christianity to the time of the creation of the Nicene Creed (the prefix "ante" means "before"). People in this category include Polycarp, Tertullian, Julius Africanus, Ignatius, Origen, and Clement.

The writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers are the subject of controversy within Christianity.

Supporters contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent Christian doctrine of the first centuries after the New Testament, and are thus presupposed by certain Christian apologists to be uncorrupted by later distortions and departures introduced by heretics and apostates. When there was conflict about the truly catholic and orthodox interpretation of the Scriptures, theologians sought backing for their position in the writings of "the Fathers". By this they meant teachers of an earlier era who demonstrated how the apostolic scriptures were understood and applied by the apostles and their immediate successors.

Critics and detractors, chiefly Protestants, anti-Catholics, Christian liberals and atheists contend that the positions held by the Fathers represent a radical corruption of pure Christian doctrine as evidence of the beginning of a Great Apostasy immediately after the death of the last Apostles and the completion of the New Testament, by syncretism with pagan Greek and Roman philosophies, and culminating in the 4th century invention of the pseudo-Christian-Pagan Catholic Church mandated by Roman Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea, immediately followed by the persecution of true Christians as heretics. Evidence of this corruption and apostasy is seen by Protestant and Fundamentalist apologists in the evident contrast of the "Catholic doctrines" in the Ante-Nicene Fathers with "the pure doctrines of New Testament Christianity rediscovered by the leaders of the Protestant Reformation."

The 20 Canons of the Council of Nicaea demonstrate absolutely no syncretistic compromise with pagan religion, as some have charged.[1] There is no evidence in any readings of the texts of the documents of the Council of Nicaea to support the charge that the emperor Constantine dictated to the council of bishops any change in doctrinal teaching or that he decreed or mandated any revision in any definition of Christian terms to accommodate any pagan beliefs, Roman or Greek or Babylonian.

See also

External links

  • ↑ See The Canons of the Council of Nicaea (christian-history.org) The commentary by the author rejects and even condemns outright some of the canons as being Catholic, sinful, and opposed to the Bible, but most significantly he says nothing about any pagan religious beliefs being evident in any of them.
    • Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ante-Nicene_Fathers&oldid=1561988"