Difference between revisions of "Scientific basis for creationism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) m (→top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.icr.org → https://www.icr.org) |
Toby Chester (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Despite some disagreement from [[evolution]]ists, the theory of [[creationism]] has strong support among | + | Despite some disagreement from [[evolution]]ists, the theory of [[creationism]] has strong support among [[scientist]]s across disciplines. Several [[physicist]]s - members of the [[RATE Group]] - recently concluded that a theory of accelerated radioactive decay supported a theory of a [[young earth]], and suggested flaws in [[radiometric dating]] that place the Earth's age in the billions, rather than the thousands.<ref>https://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=print&ID=114</ref> An increasing number of skeptics, including the Reverend Michael Reiss, a [[biologist]] and pastor in the [[Church of England]], suggest teaching creationism alongside evolution.<ref>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article4734767.ece</ref> |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 14:29, November 12, 2019
Despite some disagreement from evolutionists, the theory of creationism has strong support among scientists across disciplines. Several physicists - members of the RATE Group - recently concluded that a theory of accelerated radioactive decay supported a theory of a young earth, and suggested flaws in radiometric dating that place the Earth's age in the billions, rather than the thousands.[1] An increasing number of skeptics, including the Reverend Michael Reiss, a biologist and pastor in the Church of England, suggest teaching creationism alongside evolution.[2]