Difference between revisions of "Talk:Starlight problem"
(I ment what I wrote.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== My applogies, but thats funny == | == My applogies, but thats funny == | ||
| − | The Earth is only | + | The Earth is only 6k years old, but the rest of the universe is billions of years old because of time dilation. Wouldn't it just be easier to make the Earth a few billion years old too, without invoking divine intervention? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 20:30, 14 May 2007 (EDT) |
| + | : I meant what I wrote. Please don't change my comments. The first sentence is a restatement of the current article statement. The second sentence is Occam's Razor. I am by no means a YEC. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 20:33, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:33, May 15, 2007
Removed "facts" which were not facts. I will not hesitate to block offenders of the conservapedia commandments. Conservative 20:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
He means it! I got blocked for a week for saying light from the Andromeda Galaxy had been traveling for three million years. Czolgolz 20:25, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I'd still like to know how he's going to debunk the parallax measurement technique, which is just highschool geometry, the only variable is the distance between the Earth and the Sun, which is pretty well known, we've even sent space probes to the Sun... MiddleMan
My applogies, but thats funny
The Earth is only 6k years old, but the rest of the universe is billions of years old because of time dilation. Wouldn't it just be easier to make the Earth a few billion years old too, without invoking divine intervention? --Mtur 20:30, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- I meant what I wrote. Please don't change my comments. The first sentence is a restatement of the current article statement. The second sentence is Occam's Razor. I am by no means a YEC. --Mtur 20:33, 14 May 2007 (EDT)