Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trump's inept advisers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(delete) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Where in U.S. law would we find this authority? [[User:FabioZ|FabioZ]] ([[User talk:FabioZ|talk]]) 18:53, 27 December 2020 (EST) | Where in U.S. law would we find this authority? [[User:FabioZ|FabioZ]] ([[User talk:FabioZ|talk]]) 18:53, 27 December 2020 (EST) | ||
:Here's a good timely cite. [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/its_for_mike_pence_to_judge_whether_a_presidential_election_was_held_at_all.html] I got more, too, if you need more help. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:59, 27 December 2020 (EST) | :Here's a good timely cite. [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/its_for_mike_pence_to_judge_whether_a_presidential_election_was_held_at_all.html] I got more, too, if you need more help. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:59, 27 December 2020 (EST) | ||
| − | ::With all due respect, all I see there are unusual interpretations of the relevant law, which is the Electoral Count Act of 1887, as codified in Title 3, Chapter 1, of the United States Code (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-1). I do not see anything there that gives the vice president, presiding over the count as president of the Senate, any authority to reject states' electoral votes or to make any determination of which votes to count in the event that more | + | ::With all due respect, all I see there are unusual interpretations of the relevant law, which is the Electoral Count Act of 1887, as codified in Title 3, Chapter 1, of the United States Code (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-1). I do not see anything there that gives the vice president, presiding over the count as president of the Senate, any authority to reject states' electoral votes or to make any determination of which votes to count in the event that more that one is submitted from any state. All objections and determinations are within Congress's authority. [[User:FabioZ|FabioZ]] ([[User talk:FabioZ|talk]]) 19:37, 27 December 2020 (EST) |
Revision as of 17:35, January 8, 2021
Karl Rove
I think it would be helpful to have a section on neocon RINO Karl Rove, as he reportedly had been advising Trump's campaign for months. However, I don't know enough about this type of stuff as Andy does, though it certainly doesn't seem like a coincidence in regards to his presence and some setbacks that have happened. —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Wednesday, 01:16, 23 December 2020 (EST)
Question
Where in U.S. law would we find this authority? FabioZ (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2020 (EST)
- Here's a good timely cite. [1] I got more, too, if you need more help. RobSFree Kyle! 18:59, 27 December 2020 (EST)
- With all due respect, all I see there are unusual interpretations of the relevant law, which is the Electoral Count Act of 1887, as codified in Title 3, Chapter 1, of the United States Code (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-1). I do not see anything there that gives the vice president, presiding over the count as president of the Senate, any authority to reject states' electoral votes or to make any determination of which votes to count in the event that more that one is submitted from any state. All objections and determinations are within Congress's authority. FabioZ (talk) 19:37, 27 December 2020 (EST)