Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bourke Hickenlooper"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So from what I'm reading, Hickenlooper proposed an amendment to the 1962 Foreign Assistance Act that would have ended foreign aid to any country expropriating U.S. property. [https://fascinatingpolitics.com/2019/05/29/the-first-hickenlooper/] According to WP, it was defeated with a 35–45 tally [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourke_B._Hickenlooper#Hickenlooper_Amendment], though from what I found on GovTrack, it says that it had been a 40–45 vote... [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/87-1962/s268] —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 14:02, 21 February 2021 (EST) | So from what I'm reading, Hickenlooper proposed an amendment to the 1962 Foreign Assistance Act that would have ended foreign aid to any country expropriating U.S. property. [https://fascinatingpolitics.com/2019/05/29/the-first-hickenlooper/] According to WP, it was defeated with a 35–45 tally [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourke_B._Hickenlooper#Hickenlooper_Amendment], though from what I found on GovTrack, it says that it had been a 40–45 vote... [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/87-1962/s268] —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 14:02, 21 February 2021 (EST) | ||
:Sounds like this is directly related to the Cuban government under Castro seizing the phone company, [[ITT]] property. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:12, 21 February 2021 (EST) | :Sounds like this is directly related to the Cuban government under Castro seizing the phone company, [[ITT]] property. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:12, 21 February 2021 (EST) | ||
| − | :(Note: you should be clear on the distinction between "U.S. government property" and property of U.S. citizens and corporations. The contemporaneous reports of that era are loaded with ambiguities, referring to private property as "U.S. property"). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:15, 21 February 2021 (EST) | + | :(Note: you should be clear on the distinction between "U.S. government property" and property of U.S. citizens and corporations. The contemporaneous reports of that "pre-globalist" era are loaded with ambiguities, referring to private property as "U.S. property"). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:15, 21 February 2021 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:17, February 21, 2021
Hickenlooper amendment
So from what I'm reading, Hickenlooper proposed an amendment to the 1962 Foreign Assistance Act that would have ended foreign aid to any country expropriating U.S. property. [1] According to WP, it was defeated with a 35–45 tally [2], though from what I found on GovTrack, it says that it had been a 40–45 vote... [3] —LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 14:02, 21 February 2021 (EST)
- Sounds like this is directly related to the Cuban government under Castro seizing the phone company, ITT property. RobSFree Kyle! 14:12, 21 February 2021 (EST)
- (Note: you should be clear on the distinction between "U.S. government property" and property of U.S. citizens and corporations. The contemporaneous reports of that "pre-globalist" era are loaded with ambiguities, referring to private property as "U.S. property"). RobSFree Kyle! 14:15, 21 February 2021 (EST)