Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Inappropriate/trolling behavior"

Revision as of 18:09, May 10, 2021

These two examples:

Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.
A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing and/or impeding other editors productive activity. (See 90/10 rule)

are somewhat redundant and should be combined to clarify. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 14:05, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

How about,

Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste other users time. A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing runs the risk of running afoul of the 90/10 rule.

However, we don't want to give a license to trolls who spend 85% of their time trolling CP. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 14:09, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 *''A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing and/or impeding other editors productive activity. (See 90/10 rule)
 are somewhat redundant and should be combined to clarify. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:05, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
+How about,
+*''Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste other users time. A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing runs the risk of running afoul of the [[90/10 rule]].
+However, we don't want to give a license to trolls who spend 85% of their time trolling CP. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:09, 10 May 2021 (EDT)