Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Inappropriate/trolling behavior"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
How about,  
 
How about,  
−
*''Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste other users time. A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing runs the risk of running afoul of the [[90/10 rule]].
+
*''Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste other users' time. A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing runs the risk of running afoul of the [[90/10 rule]].
 
However, we don't want to give a license to trolls who spend 85% of their time trolling CP. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:09, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
 
However, we don't want to give a license to trolls who spend 85% of their time trolling CP. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 14:09, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:09, May 10, 2021

These two examples:

  • Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions.
  • A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing and/or impeding other editors productive activity. (See 90/10 rule)

are somewhat redundant and should be combined to clarify. RobSFree Kyle! 14:05, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

How about,

  • Employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste other users' time. A user that spends 90% of their editing time and activity making redundant arguments, complaining, harassing runs the risk of running afoul of the 90/10 rule.

However, we don't want to give a license to trolls who spend 85% of their time trolling CP. RobSFree Kyle! 14:09, 10 May 2021 (EDT)