Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacey Abrams"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::It was sourced to [[Brad Raffensperger]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT) | ::It was sourced to [[Brad Raffensperger]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
:::So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT) | :::So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::::Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:50, May 11, 2021
Please discuss alternative language here. Thank you. RobSFree Kyle! 23:58, 10 May 2021 (EDT)
- I honestly don't give a darn about discussions, especially when they waste time and many times are unproductive. But fine, I'll humor you. The edit about Stacey Abrams was up and out sourced, and last I checked, if a wiki edit has sourced information, it is to STAY, UNLESS the source is up and out false and/or doesn't match up. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
- It was sourced to Brad Raffensperger. RobSFree Kyle! 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
- So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
- Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? RobSFree Kyle! 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
- So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
- It was sourced to Brad Raffensperger. RobSFree Kyle! 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT)