Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacey Abrams"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
::::Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
 
::::Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
  
−
::::Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
+
::::Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name to make him look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:57, May 11, 2021

Please discuss alternative language here. Thank you. RobSFree Kyle! 23:58, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

I honestly don't give a darn about discussions, especially when they waste time and many times are unproductive. But fine, I'll humor you. The edit about Stacey Abrams was up and out sourced, and last I checked, if a wiki edit has sourced information, it is to STAY, UNLESS the source is up and out false and/or doesn't match up. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
It was sourced to Brad Raffensperger. RobSFree Kyle! 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? RobSFree Kyle! 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name to make him look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. RobSFree Kyle! 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)