Talk:Stacey Abrams

Please discuss alternative language here. Thank you. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 23:58, 10 May 2021 (EDT)

I honestly don't give a darn about discussions, especially when they waste time and many times are unproductive. But fine, I'll humor you. The edit about Stacey Abrams was up and out sourced, and last I checked, if a wiki edit has sourced information, it is to STAY, UNLESS the source is up and out false and/or doesn't match up. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

It was sourced to Brad Raffensperger. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 05:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

So? It still is sourced showing how Abrams was ultimately a sore loser who would rather peddle conspiracy theories than accept her loss. And let me remind you that despite being a far-left website otherwise, HuffPost actually DID give an article that gave surprisingly severe condemnation of Che Guevara and Fidel Castro. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Does Brad Raffensaperger represent a conservative perspective? is he a credible source? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 05:50, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Brad Raffensperger cannot be used without naming him by name to make him look credible. Failing to do so appears to be the work of woke leftists. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 05:56, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

HuffPost is a very left-wing source, yet when even THEY admit that Che Guevara was a scumbag who shouldn't be worshipped, broke ranks with their fellow leftists at that, it's still grounds for citation despite that. I'm pretty sure even Raffensberger still qualifies as a valid source in this particular case as well. Either way, I fail to see how Stacey Abrams comes out clean with that source, and if anything removing it is more likely to aid her than it is to aid Conservativism. To put it another way, I fail to see how Woke Leftists would have anything to gain citing Raffensberger at all, especially when if anything that would cause them to stop supporting Abrams. Pokeria1 (talk) 05:59, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

It was never mentioned that Brad Raffensperger was the source trashing Abrams. Using his name might have even generated some sympathy for Abrams rather than making her look like a paranoid conspiracy kook. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 06:10, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

And would the fact that Raffensberger was technically on her side be more of a reason to use it as a source since he's literally condemning her? Besides, woke leftists don't even listen to him anyways, even when he's capitulating to their ends. Even though George W. Bush was closer in political outlook to George Lucas regarding globalism, the latter STILL trashes the former as a provincial boob who doesn't care about the world. It would be the same deal here. Pokeria1 (talk) 06:18, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Oh so now George W. Bush, who was the reincarnation of Hitler, is now a great American hero like John McCain to the left? Let's wait 4 more years when President DeSantis takes office and then hear leftists sing the praises of Donald Trump. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 06:33, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

First of all, I didn't say George Lucas was singing praises for Bush, I said the exact opposite, especially when there were a few conservatives even back then who also weren't fond of the Bushes (even called them the Bush Crime Family). Heck, we had a few on Conservapedia even BEFORE Trump got elected. Second of all, it's unlikely they're going to be singing praises for Donald Trump anytime soon. Pokeria1 (talk) 06:52, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Yah well I'm having a hard time connecting the dots how a bunch of racists are trying to make Stacy Abrams look bad by citing Brad Raffenbsperger without using his name. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 07:05, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

It has absolutely nothing to do with her race. If Stacey Abrams had the appearance of, say, Melissa McCarthy or Rosie O'Donnell (ie, caucasian) and she did those things, we'd cite him anyways. Pokeria1 (talk) 07:12, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

That's the problem - Raffensperger was not named as the source. And again, an insult to our conservative readers' intelligence. Do you believe Brad Raffensperger is an authority on who is and who is not a conspiracy theorist? do you think our conservative readers are that stupid they will believe any line of garbage from an unnamed source? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 07:23, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Quite frankly, I don't care at this point. If anything, we haven't gone far enough to STOP the left dead in its tracks regarding exposing their crap. If we were going much farther in exposing the left and breaking them like Northwest was doing, Trump probably would still be in office right now instead of Biden, and the mask policy would be gone much sooner rather than our being stuck with it thanks to our idiot corporate heads stupidly insisting that we wait for the CDC to give the green light to removing the masks, in spite of their not only already removing the six feet social distancing, but also the fact that the CDC was just recently exposed as having kept the schools closed simply because the American Federation of Teachers told them not to reopen them at any point, and such reasonings had absolutely NOTHING to do with COVID-19, meaning they're no longer even trustworthy and certainly not likely to remove the mask guidelines regardless of the science. Pokeria1 (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

Breaking the left? Who put all this trolling garbage in this and the Communism article (and other articles)? With the 90/10 rule, woke leftists have to pretend to be bona fide. Me personally, I do not focus on reverting blanked pages. I ferret out subversive content placed in articles. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 07:42, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

If you're implying that I'm a woke leftist, forget it. If anything, I outright HATE the left, especially the woke left, especially after how they tried to brainwash me in college and in various media I consume, which is ALSO why I am downright furious with people trying to make Conservapedia more like Wikipedia right now, including you and Conservative. My bona fide is genuine in other words. And I also try to revert any attempts at vandalization as well, as did NorthWest (more than blanked out pages, if I must add). Pokeria1 (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2021 (EDT)

I can't be fooled. I've been at this game too long. I got arrested when I was 12 years old as a Young Republican for peeling off a George Wallace bumper sticker. Although I was too stupid to realize how a third party split among Democrats would help Republicans, I still had my priorities right, choosing peace with honor over a bunch of racist law and order types and Democrats willing to chew up American youth in endless, unwinnable wars. I'm rarely fooled by any line of garbage, and the longer I study it and recognize patterns and outcomes, the clearer it becomes. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 08:13, 11 May 2021 (EDT)