Difference between revisions of "Category talk:RINO Backers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::The problem here is the term is intended as a pejorative. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:34, May 29, 2021 (EDT) | ::::The problem here is the term is intended as a pejorative. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:34, May 29, 2021 (EDT) | ||
| − | :::The question is quite simple: As an alternative Wikipedia, ''why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content?'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT) | + | :::The question is quite simple: As an alternative to Wikipedia, ''why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content?'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT) |
Revision as of 01:38, May 30, 2021
If there is such a thing as a "RINO Backer", why isn't Donald Trump in it for backing Chris Christie? RobSFree Kyle! 21:19, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
- You do bring up a good point. Even adamant conservatives like Trump sometimes endorses establishment-leaning Republicans. —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 21:24, May 29, 2021 (EDT)- To be fair, User:TonySideaway exposed the Ratvandal Senate Hit List and wrote about it, and is one of Wikipedia's experts in dealing with vandalism. However I personally do not regard his creation of this category as a good faith contribution, IMHO. RobSFree Kyle! 21:27, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
- The user created the Category and walked away from it. He has not edited in 7 years. [1] RobSFree Kyle! 21:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
- Yeah, now that you mention it, this category perhaps wasn't the best idea. I also noticed that on the official CP page for RINO Backers, Sarah Palin is considered such simply because she didn't defend Todd Akin in 2012. Does that really make sense? —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 21:32, May 29, 2021 (EDT)- The problem here is the term is intended as a pejorative. RobSFree Kyle! 21:34, May 29, 2021 (EDT)
- Yeah, now that you mention it, this category perhaps wasn't the best idea. I also noticed that on the official CP page for RINO Backers, Sarah Palin is considered such simply because she didn't defend Todd Akin in 2012. Does that really make sense? —
- The question is quite simple: As an alternative to Wikipedia, why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content? RobSFree Kyle! 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT)