Category talk:RINO Backers

If there is such a thing as a "RINO Backer", why isn't Donald Trump in it for backing Chris Christie? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:19, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

You do bring up a good point. Even adamant conservatives like Trump sometimes endorses establishment-leaning Republicans. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 21:24, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

To be fair, User:TonySideaway exposed the Ratvandal Senate Hit List and wrote about it, and is one of Wikipedia's experts in dealing with vandalism. However I personally do not regard his creation of this category as a good faith contribution, IMHO. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:27, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

The user created the Category and walked away from it. He has not edited in 7 years. [1] RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:31, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Yeah, now that you mention it, this category perhaps wasn't the best idea. I also noticed that on the official CP page for RINO Backers, Sarah Palin is considered such simply because she didn't defend Todd Akin in 2012. Does that really make sense? —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 21:32, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

The problem here is the term is intended as a pejorative. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:34, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

The question is quite simple: As an alternative to Wikipedia, why has Conservapedia allowed Wikipedia functionaries to shape its content? RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:37, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Subversive influences on CP evidently have been enabled by the site leadership. —LT^{May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!} Sunday, 21:40, May 29, 2021 (EDT)

Well, Ed Poor for example could be regarded as WP functionary, so that criteria is a bit overstated. However back to my main point: I don't beleive this was a good faith contribution by a user who knew what he was doing to sow division and chaos. Sarah Palin is in CP's Top Dozen alltime most Popular pages, yet the categorization scheme is intened as a slur. RobS^{Free Kyle!} 21:47, May 29, 2021 (EDT)