Difference between revisions of "Talk:NATO war in Ukraine"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Turkey cannot be considered a belligerent power yet: *Turkey host peace talks and acts as mediator; *Turkey has not imposed sanctions and welcomes Russian investors and touris...") |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Please, think twice before inserting ANY information attributed to Ukrainian sources, like [[Klitschko]] (remember what [[Nuland]] said about Klitschko?) [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 01:50, May 2, 2022 (EDT) | Please, think twice before inserting ANY information attributed to Ukrainian sources, like [[Klitschko]] (remember what [[Nuland]] said about Klitschko?) [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 01:50, May 2, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Turkey would fall under NATO, anyway, which is already listed, showing how susceptible you are to Ukie propaganda, brainwashing, and Western psyops. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 02:12, May 2, 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:12, May 2, 2022
Turkey cannot be considered a belligerent power yet:
- Turkey host peace talks and acts as mediator;
- Turkey has not imposed sanctions and welcomes Russian investors and tourists;
- Turkey has closed the Dardanelles to NATO warships;
- Grey Wolves is not a government entity;
- Turkish cooperation with Russia in Syria.
On the other side of the leger you have:
- Sale of Baktayar drones to Ukraine.
Now, if you can prove Turkey allowed NATO forces through the Dardanelles to sink the Moskva, you possible have a case, however that still appears highly unlikely.
Please, think twice before inserting ANY information attributed to Ukrainian sources, like Klitschko (remember what Nuland said about Klitschko?) RobSZ 01:50, May 2, 2022 (EDT)
Turkey would fall under NATO, anyway, which is already listed, showing how susceptible you are to Ukie propaganda, brainwashing, and Western psyops. RobSZ 02:12, May 2, 2022 (EDT)