Difference between revisions of "Talk:NATO war in Ukraine"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Turkey would fall under NATO, anyway, which is already listed, showing how susceptible you are to Ukie propaganda, brainwashing, and Western psyops. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 02:12, May 2, 2022 (EDT) | Turkey would fall under NATO, anyway, which is already listed, showing how susceptible you are to Ukie propaganda, brainwashing, and Western psyops. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 02:12, May 2, 2022 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==DPR snipers== | ||
| + | DPR snipers are using the same 1943 & 1944 Mosin sniper rifles their grandfathers used to kill Nazi to kill Nazis today. [https://youtu.be/YN6I9IJMxtY?t=756] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 16:49, June 2, 2022 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:49, June 2, 2022
Turkey cannot be considered a belligerent power yet:
- Turkey host peace talks and acts as mediator;
- Turkey has not imposed sanctions and welcomes Russian investors and tourists;
- Turkey has closed the Dardanelles to NATO warships;
- Grey Wolves is not a government entity;
- Turkish cooperation with Russia in Syria.
On the other side of the leger you have:
- Sale of Baktayar drones to Ukraine.
Now, if you can prove Turkey allowed NATO forces through the Dardanelles to sink the Moskva, you possible have a case, however that still appears highly unlikely.
Please, think twice before inserting ANY information attributed to Ukrainian sources, like Klitschko (remember what Nuland said about Klitschko?) RobSZ 01:50, May 2, 2022 (EDT)
Turkey would fall under NATO, anyway, which is already listed, showing how susceptible you are to Ukie propaganda, brainwashing, and Western psyops. RobSZ 02:12, May 2, 2022 (EDT)
DPR snipers
DPR snipers are using the same 1943 & 1944 Mosin sniper rifles their grandfathers used to kill Nazi to kill Nazis today. [1] RobSZ 16:49, June 2, 2022 (EDT)