Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation"
m (Protected "Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse": unprotect [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]) |
(RobS deleting factual edits with valid citations) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == RobS deleting factual edits with valid citations == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I wish to file a complaint about the deletion of an edit I wrote for the [[Censorhip]] topic. RobS falsely accuses me of subterfuge and an anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit agenda when I described one of the best-known instances of censorship in history, and one of the first instances (if not the first) of censorship entering the law. I neither mentioned Catholics nor Jesuits, and pointed out that the Pope had actually defended Michelangelo and prevented defacement of his work of art. The reference I sited is not a wiki mirror site, but an educational web site with many sources for its articles. One has only to look at the page I referenced to see that it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. In spie of this, RobS has issued a warning on what I believe to be entirely unfounded complaints. Read the reference I sited, check its background, read my edit and let me know if RobS is justified in censoring my edit and issuing a warning. NitramNos 14:50, 8 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:50, June 8, 2007
| Quick Links | This is where you can report abuse by Sysops. Please make notes short and concise. Do not piggyback! One new header per complaint. Unsigned posts will be removed. |
Archives Archive 1
|
RobS deleting factual edits with valid citations
I wish to file a complaint about the deletion of an edit I wrote for the Censorhip topic. RobS falsely accuses me of subterfuge and an anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit agenda when I described one of the best-known instances of censorship in history, and one of the first instances (if not the first) of censorship entering the law. I neither mentioned Catholics nor Jesuits, and pointed out that the Pope had actually defended Michelangelo and prevented defacement of his work of art. The reference I sited is not a wiki mirror site, but an educational web site with many sources for its articles. One has only to look at the page I referenced to see that it has nothing to do with Wikipedia. In spie of this, RobS has issued a warning on what I believe to be entirely unfounded complaints. Read the reference I sited, check its background, read my edit and let me know if RobS is justified in censoring my edit and issuing a warning. NitramNos 14:50, 8 June 2007 (EDT)