Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Which POV is the best?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]] See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST) | :[[User:RobSmith|RobS]] See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST) | ||
| − | ::Thank you, that was very helpful. In reading those responses, it's fairly obvious ChatGPT draws much on Wikipedia's database for its alleged "intelligence". Bu ultimately, ChatGPT reveals its own bias here: "Ultimately, it's up to each '''individual''' to evaluate these projects and determine....". Note: "[[ | + | ::Thank you, that was very helpful. In reading those responses, it's fairly obvious ChatGPT draws much on Wikipedia's database for its alleged "intelligence". Bu ultimately, ChatGPT reveals its own bias here: "Ultimately, it's up to each '''individual''' to evaluate these projects and determine....". Note: "[[individualism|individual]]" and not "[[collective]]". Seems ChatGPT has a rather conservative bias, and not a socialist collective bias as RW & WP promote. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:34, March 6, 2023 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:34, March 6, 2023
Perhaps the word "best" is problematic; CP has a bias, and we wear it on our sleeve, RW is in over its head, and WP is just a lying sack of doo-doo if it or anybody thinks it's neutral. Try it again with, Which project best meets its goals? or Which project is more honest in its objectives?
If you believe anybody or anything is unbiased, you probably believe in Sants Clause and the Tooth Fairy, too. RobSGive Peace a chance 03:16, March 5, 2023 (EST)
- RobS See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. ChenXiansheng (talk) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST)
- Thank you, that was very helpful. In reading those responses, it's fairly obvious ChatGPT draws much on Wikipedia's database for its alleged "intelligence". Bu ultimately, ChatGPT reveals its own bias here: "Ultimately, it's up to each individual to evaluate these projects and determine....". Note: "individual" and not "collective". Seems ChatGPT has a rather conservative bias, and not a socialist collective bias as RW & WP promote. RobSGive Peace a chance 14:34, March 6, 2023 (EST)