Difference between revisions of "States' Rights Democratic Party"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Contemporary historians and scholars designate the Dixiecrat party as "right-wing" and an outgrowth of anti–New Deal politics despite the vast ranks among the movement which vociferously aligned with [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] in the 1930s. (only some factions aligned with the old Southern Bourbon element) This is attributable to the inability for academic revisionists to distinguish between the old-school progressivism (once prominent in the South for decades) which predates the New Deal, with the modern liberalism that became developed in the 1940s.
 
Contemporary historians and scholars designate the Dixiecrat party as "right-wing" and an outgrowth of anti–New Deal politics despite the vast ranks among the movement which vociferously aligned with [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] in the 1930s. (only some factions aligned with the old Southern Bourbon element) This is attributable to the inability for academic revisionists to distinguish between the old-school progressivism (once prominent in the South for decades) which predates the New Deal, with the modern liberalism that became developed in the 1940s.
 +
 +
==Background==
 +
During the First and Second New Deal, the majority of Southern Democrats lined up behind President Roosevelt, supporting left-wing economic relief measures at the expense of traditional free-market principles. The New Deal enforced institutional white supremacy to appease the Democrats of the "Solid South" who ardently opposed any federal legislation which would interfere with the region's Jim Crow laws; the Federal Housing Administration not only enforced segregation, but even refused to insure houses for black families.<ref>Little, Becky (June 1, 2021). [https://www.history.com/news/housing-segregation-new-deal-program How a New Deal Housing Program Enforced Segregation]. ''History Channel''. Retrieved May 15, 2023.</ref>
  
 
==Platform<ref name=platform>August 14, 1948. [https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/platform-the-states-rights-democratic-party Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party]. ''The American Presidency Project''. Retrieved May 15, 2023.</ref>==
 
==Platform<ref name=platform>August 14, 1948. [https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/platform-the-states-rights-democratic-party Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party]. ''The American Presidency Project''. Retrieved May 15, 2023.</ref>==

Revision as of 19:10, May 15, 2023

The States' Rights Democratic Party was a United States political party formed by a splinter faction of Southern Democrats in 1948 which opposed President Harry S. Truman and the national Democratic Party. Hardline segregationists in the South with a firm progressive tradition rooted in Jeffersonianism and Jacksonianism, disenchanted with the increasing alliance between New Deal liberalism and civil rights, stormed out of the 1948 Democratic National Convention when it enacted a strong civil rights plank at the urging of Minnesota mayor and future vice president Hubert Humphrey. Members of the States' Rights Democratic Party were known as "Dixiecrats."

Contemporary historians and scholars designate the Dixiecrat party as "right-wing" and an outgrowth of anti–New Deal politics despite the vast ranks among the movement which vociferously aligned with Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 1930s. (only some factions aligned with the old Southern Bourbon element) This is attributable to the inability for academic revisionists to distinguish between the old-school progressivism (once prominent in the South for decades) which predates the New Deal, with the modern liberalism that became developed in the 1940s.

Background

During the First and Second New Deal, the majority of Southern Democrats lined up behind President Roosevelt, supporting left-wing economic relief measures at the expense of traditional free-market principles. The New Deal enforced institutional white supremacy to appease the Democrats of the "Solid South" who ardently opposed any federal legislation which would interfere with the region's Jim Crow laws; the Federal Housing Administration not only enforced segregation, but even refused to insure houses for black families.[1]

Platform[2]

“
  1. We believe that the Constitution of the United States is the greatest charter of human liberty ever conceived by the mind of man.
  2. We oppose all efforts to invade or destroy the rights guaranteed by it to every citizen of this republic.
  3. We stand for social and economic justice, which, we believe can be guaranteed to all citizens only by a strict adherence to our Constitution and the avoidance of any invasion or destruction of the constitutional rights of the states and individuals. We oppose the totalitarian, centralized bureaucratic government and the police nation called for by the platforms adopted by the Democratic and Republican Conventions.
  4. We stand for the segregation of the races and the racial integrity of each race; the constitutional right to choose one's associates; to accept private employment without governmental interference, and to earn one's living in any lawful way. We oppose the elimination of segregation, the repeal of miscegenation statutes, the control of private employment by Federal bureaucrats called for by the misnamed civil rights program. We favor home-rule, local self-government and a minimum interference with individual rights.
  5. We oppose and condemn the action of the Democratic Convention in sponsoring a civil rights program calling for the elimination of segregation, social equality by Federal fiat, regulations of private employment practices, voting, and local law enforcement.
  6. We affirm that the effective enforcement of such a program would be utterly destructive of the social, economic and political life of the Southern people, and of other localities in which there may be differences in race, creed or national origin in appreciable numbers.
  7. We stand for the check and balances provided by the three departments of our government. We oppose the usurpation of legislative functions by the executive and judicial departments. We unreservedly condemn the effort to establish in the United States a police nation that would destroy the last vestige of liberty enjoyed by a citizen.
  8. We demand that there be returned to the people to whom of right they belong, those powers needed for the preservation of human rights and the discharge of our responsibility as democrats for human welfare. We oppose a denial of those by political parties, a barter or sale of those rights by a political convention, as well as any invasion or violation of those rights by the Federal Government. We call upon all Democrats and upon all other loyal Americans who are opposed to totalitarianism at home and abroad to unite with us in ignominiously defeating Harry S. Truman, Thomas E. Dewey and every other candidate for public office who would establish a Police Nation in the United States of America.
  9. We, therefore, urge that this Convention endorse the candidacies of J. Strom Thurmond and Fielding H. Wright for the President and Vice-president, respectively, of the United States of America.
”

—Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party, August 14, 1948

Party members

References

  1. ↑ Little, Becky (June 1, 2021). How a New Deal Housing Program Enforced Segregation. History Channel. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
  2. ↑ August 14, 1948. Platform of the States Rights Democratic Party. The American Presidency Project. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
  3. ↑ Baggett, James L. (March 9, 2007). Eugene "Bull" Connor. Encyclopedia of Alabama. Retrieved May 15, 2023.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Zwiers, Maarten (July 11, 2017). James O. Eastland. Mississippi Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 15, 2023.