Difference between revisions of "Forensic politics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(As the influence of dark money and its mega-donors increases over politics, this field of forensic politics grows in significance.) |
(Forensic jurisprudence, or more simply forensic law, is a field of analyzing a judge or potential judge's prior work in order to infer how he or she will decide in future cases.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As the influence of [[dark money]] and its mega-donors increases over politics, this field of forensic politics grows in significance. | As the influence of [[dark money]] and its mega-donors increases over politics, this field of forensic politics grows in significance. | ||
| + | == Forensic jurisprudence == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Forensic jurisprudence, or more simply forensic law, is a field of analyzing a judge or potential judge's prior work in order to infer how he or she will decide in future cases. | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 19:08, May 29, 2023
Forensic politics is the field of analyzing political events in a logical or scientific way in order to deduce the true causes and motivations. It is analogous to the use of forensics in other fields, except applying it to politics.
As the influence of dark money and its mega-donors increases over politics, this field of forensic politics grows in significance.
Forensic jurisprudence
Forensic jurisprudence, or more simply forensic law, is a field of analyzing a judge or potential judge's prior work in order to infer how he or she will decide in future cases.