Difference between revisions of "DC persecution of Trump"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(last year the same judge expressed anger that Trump was not behind bars) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{cquote|[On August 11, 2023,] Judge Tanya Chutkan warned Trump's lawyers that politics had no place in her courtroom or in this case. | {{cquote|[On August 11, 2023,] Judge Tanya Chutkan warned Trump's lawyers that politics had no place in her courtroom or in this case. | ||
| − | But here is Judge Chutkan berating a | + | But here is Judge Chutkan berating a [[J6]]er during a sentencing hearing in Oct. 2022. |
She clearly expressed anger that Trump was still "free" and not behind bars.<ref>https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1690097151156629504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1690097151156629504%7Ctwgr%5Ebfbaa2b75227cdf6542f16b431f7da87364fc166%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2023%2F08%2Fobama-judge-tanya-chutkan-previously-expressed-anger-trump%2F</ref>}} | She clearly expressed anger that Trump was still "free" and not behind bars.<ref>https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1690097151156629504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1690097151156629504%7Ctwgr%5Ebfbaa2b75227cdf6542f16b431f7da87364fc166%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2023%2F08%2Fobama-judge-tanya-chutkan-previously-expressed-anger-trump%2F</ref>}} | ||
Revision as of 23:20, August 13, 2023
The DC persecution of Trump is an unprecedented attempt by Trump-hating prosecutors and judges in Washington, D.C. to censor and even imprison Trump to try to prevent him from reelected as president.
This misuse of prosecutorial power, led by the academically underachieving Jack Smith, violates at least 3 provisions and principles of the U.S. Constitution:
- the Qualifications Clause (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5)
- the First Amendment right of the American people to hear from the front-runner for president, and Trump's right to campaign
- separation of powers doctrine
Both the prosecutors and the presiding judge took an oath to abide by the U.S. Constitution, yet are not complying with the above provisions.
Bias
| “ | [On August 11, 2023,] Judge Tanya Chutkan warned Trump's lawyers that politics had no place in her courtroom or in this case.
But here is Judge Chutkan berating a J6er during a sentencing hearing in Oct. 2022. She clearly expressed anger that Trump was still "free" and not behind bars.[1] |
” |
References
- ↑ https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1690097151156629504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1690097151156629504%7Ctwgr%5Ebfbaa2b75227cdf6542f16b431f7da87364fc166%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2023%2F08%2Fobama-judge-tanya-chutkan-previously-expressed-anger-trump%2F