Difference between revisions of "Talk:Global fascism"
m (→I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism") |
(→I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism") |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Don't take any of these comments as being the last word. But basically we've had this discussion on the [[Fascism]] talk page; fascism originally was an economic concept, that post-1939 acquired a different meaning in the Angelosphere anti-Nazi propaganda networks with quite a different meaning from its original context. And that revised meaning persists to this day, which, IMO, creates a lot of confusion. | :Don't take any of these comments as being the last word. But basically we've had this discussion on the [[Fascism]] talk page; fascism originally was an economic concept, that post-1939 acquired a different meaning in the Angelosphere anti-Nazi propaganda networks with quite a different meaning from its original context. And that revised meaning persists to this day, which, IMO, creates a lot of confusion. | ||
| − | :For now, I'd suggest creating a redirect [[Global neo-fascism]] to here until this concept gets worked out (and this also avoids creating more | + | :For now, I'd suggest creating a redirect [[Global neo-fascism]] to here until this concept gets worked out (and this also avoids creating more confusion by having to create a separate neo-fascism article to distinguish it from Global neo-fasicm). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:37, September 7, 2023 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | :War propaganda tends to do things like this - change the meaning of words and concepts from the beginning of the conflict until its ultimate end. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:40, September 7, 2023 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:40, September 7, 2023
I suggest moving this page title to "Global neofascism"
The problem with "fascism" in this context is that it completely ignores the historical definitive characteristics of fascist ideology. Italian Fascism's occult-rooted concept of orthodox nationalism fused into the tenets of Marxist socialism can be summarized as "national syndicalism with a philosophy of actualism." Unless one can provide a proper basis to designate the globalist agenda as "national syndicalist," the straight-up "fascist" label is simply misleading.
On the other hand, "neofascism," more all-encompassing in what it can refer to, is a better term—the global "fascism" in our present day is not the same old strain of Fascism in Mussolini's Italy, but rather a newly developed form that applies its totalitarian tenets and particularly, a "compromise" between capitalism and Communism ("state capitalism," where private property rights are neither universal nor entirely confiscated, but granted on conditional circumstances), to a differently oriented system.
A nationalist labor union movement clamoring for a syndicate vanguard/federation to seize the means of production would probably be close to old-school Fascist ideology. Modern-day globalism isn't, and can at best be considered "neofascist." It is also worth noting that the neo-Marxist social agenda of contemporary globalists is contrary to the cultural social rigidity pursued by Italian Fascists (also a feature of Soviet Communism). Modern-day "moral degeneracy" can be traced to the New Left, whose ideologues borrowed from the Frankfurt School led by Antonio Gramsci, who tried to assassinate Mussolini. With this fact alone, designating a movement grounded in neo-Marxism as "fascist" is silly, seeing that neo-Marxists were not only antithetical to the social rigidity aspect of classical Fascism, but even violently attempted to overthrow Fascism in a age-old manifestation of intrasocialist conflict. It's also worth noting that neo-Marxists are not "Communists." Sure, Marxist–Leninist theory promoted moral degradation, but actual Communist regimes were culturally "national-conservative." —LT Rev. 22:13 Thursday, 16:24, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
- Don't take any of these comments as being the last word. But basically we've had this discussion on the Fascism talk page; fascism originally was an economic concept, that post-1939 acquired a different meaning in the Angelosphere anti-Nazi propaganda networks with quite a different meaning from its original context. And that revised meaning persists to this day, which, IMO, creates a lot of confusion.
- For now, I'd suggest creating a redirect Global neo-fascism to here until this concept gets worked out (and this also avoids creating more confusion by having to create a separate neo-fascism article to distinguish it from Global neo-fasicm). RobSGive Peace a Chance! 16:37, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
- War propaganda tends to do things like this - change the meaning of words and concepts from the beginning of the conflict until its ultimate end. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 16:40, September 7, 2023 (EDT)
