Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/Forecasting"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Protected "User:Conservative/Forecasting" ([Edit=Administrators only] (indefinite) [Move=Administrators only] (indefinite)))
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
*[https://lifeclub.org/books/superforecasting-philip-e-tetlock-and-dan-gardner-review-summary Superforecasting Summary and Review by Philip E. Tetlock and Dan Gardner]
 
*[https://lifeclub.org/books/superforecasting-philip-e-tetlock-and-dan-gardner-review-summary Superforecasting Summary and Review by Philip E. Tetlock and Dan Gardner]
 +
 +
*[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/06/how-to-predict-the-future/588040/ The Peculiar Blindness of Experts] - Credentialed authorities are comically bad at predicting the future. But reliable forecasting is possible.
 +
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcnj61KSOhM Professor Philip Tetlock on His Groundbreaking Research About 'Expert Judgment'] - video
 +
 +
== Political forecasting ==
 +
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f73A-HB-08M Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?] by Philip Tetlock - video
 +
 +
*[https://www.amazon.com/Expert-Political-Judgment-Good-Know/dp/0691128715/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256588850&sr=8-1 Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?] by Philip E. Tetlock, Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (August 20, 2006)
 +
 +
'''2.''' Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article ''Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being'': "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the [[leftism|left]] and the [[right-wing|right]]—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."<ref>[https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/10/reading-too-much-political-news-bad-happiness/616651/ Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being] by Arthur C. Brooks, The Atlantic, 2020</ref>
 +
 +
*[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691617746796 At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives] - ''Perspectives on Psychological Science''
 +
 +
*[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963721418817755 Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies]
 +
 +
'''3.''' [[Political betting markets]] have better accuracy than polls and pundits.

Revision as of 03:03, September 13, 2023

General forecasting

Political forecasting

2. Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being: "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the left and the right—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[1]

3. Political betting markets have better accuracy than polls and pundits.

  1. ↑ Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being by Arthur C. Brooks, The Atlantic, 2020