Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/Forecasting"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
== Economic forecasting ==
 
== Economic forecasting ==
  
−
== Economic forecasts ==
+
 
  
 
*[https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendars/economic Economic calendar]
 
*[https://www.marketwatch.com/economy-politics/calendars/economic Economic calendar]
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
*[https://www.google.com/search?q=inverted+yield+curve&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS771US771&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjk-73WjNjeAhVIyxoKHb7MAVgQ_AUIDigB&biw=1024&bih=626 Inverted yield curve - Google search]
 
*[https://www.google.com/search?q=inverted+yield+curve&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS771US771&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjk-73WjNjeAhVIyxoKHb7MAVgQ_AUIDigB&biw=1024&bih=626 Inverted yield curve - Google search]
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>

Revision as of 03:06, September 13, 2023

General forecasting

Political forecasting

1. Political expert forecasts

2. Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being: "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the left and the right—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[1]

3. Political betting markets have better accuracy than polls and pundits.

Economic forecasting

Yield curve

References

  1. ↑ Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being by Arthur C. Brooks, The Atlantic, 2020