Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gamma male"

Revision as of 07:47, November 5, 2023

This article as written, apparently adopts the liberal evolutionary point of view. Conservapedia's Animal#Animals_and_people states:

RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 01:17, November 5, 2023 (EST)

Some similarities does not proven commmon descent. It could be a common designer using various designs in creation in multiple places instead (Rather than recreating the wheel in every instance.). That's Creationism 101. Humans have DNA. Apes have DNA. Humans have eyes. Apes have eyes. Humans have two arms. Apes have two arms, etc. etc. Conservative (talk) 01:21, November 5, 2023 (EST)

The CP article says. "it is their methodological naturalism that leads them to ignore major qualitative differences and to speculate that humans are merely animals with somewhat greater intellectual ability. This vision may be more a predisposition than a scientific conclusion."

As written, it belongs in Category:Pseudoscience. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 01:27, November 5, 2023 (EST)

The leading creationist organization Answers in Genesis uses the phrase "alpha male" four separate times on their website as can be seen HERE. Are you also going to try to ban creationists, scientists, sociologists, psychiatrists, and the general public from using terms like "alpha male". That's one of the craziest and politically correct things I have ever heard. Why don't we ban Conservapedia's male and female articles too because both animals and humans have males and females too?

Are you going to delete Conservapedia's Alpha male and Beta male articles too? That sounds kind of soy boy and politically correct to me. Conservative (talk) 01:35, November 5, 2023 (EST)

No. I am simply pointing out the CP Animal article states: "it is of primary importance to distinguish the characteristics of people from animals", and your original article stated: Gamma male behavior among other animals, "other" implying the human species is an animal. Let's not be foolhardy here: you and I both know the reason for your recent obsession with trash talking gamma males, who apparently are a very large portion of the human population, if not the majority of human males. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 01:46, November 5, 2023 (EST)

RobSmith, you need to stop being so RobCentric. Not every article is about you. Scientists and others use the terms alpha males, beta males and gamma males. You may not like it, but that is the way it is. Conservative (talk) 01:51, November 5, 2023 (EST)

Ok, I'll leave you to your liberal views and insistence that man is an animal. I bet Andy doesn't agree with you on this one. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 01:55, November 5, 2023 (EST)

Answers in Genesis considers men to be animals (Sarcasm). That's a good one! Priceless! See: Answers in Genesis using the word 'alpha male" on 4 separate places on their website. Ken Ham is an alpha male - not some whiny, gamma male who gossips! Conservative (talk) 02:02, November 5, 2023 (EST)

Answers in Genesis does not consider man to be an animal:

RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 02:22, November 5, 2023 (EST)