Difference between revisions of "Letitia James"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Liberals]] | [[Category:Liberals]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Democrats]] | + | [[Category:Democrats]][[Category:Election interference]] |
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians|James]] | [[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians|James]] | ||
[[Category:Racists]] | [[Category:Racists]] | ||
Revision as of 00:57, December 20, 2023
Letitia James (born in 1958) is attorney general and witch hunt of New York state. Since her declaration to run as attorney general of New York, she came after President Donald Trump, to playing witch hunt and cancel culture games of liberals by trying to convict him of fake crimes involving nonexistent business fraud.[1] James has publicly referred to the Trump administration as "male, pale, and stale".[2]
2024 Presidential election interference
- See also: 2024 Presidential election interference
In the case filed by Letitia James against President Trump there are no victims. There was no fraud. All of the lenders did their own due diligence. All of the loans were paid back without issue and the statement of financial condition was factual and accurate.
Additionally, the statute being used as the predicate for the case is a consumer fraud statute, intended to protect borrowers from predatory lenders. In the four corners of this case, Trump is the borrower, and the banks were the lenders. The New York attorney general flipped the statute to claim the borrower defrauded the lenders, despite the lenders denying there was any fraud and stating there was no harm.[3]
Andy McCarthy noted, "First of all this whole New York justice system is fraudulent in the sense that these are elected Democrats. She is an elected Democrat as who campaigned for office on a vow that she would use the power of the state to get him, which is a kind of a Soviet way of going about your business. The judge is an elected Democrat. So the whole system is not like what we have in the federal system where you have appointed prosecutors and appointed judges who are vetted by the Senate, at least in the hope that it will ensure that they won't use their power in an abusive way. In this system, they're actually electing people on a promise of going after individuals, individuals who happen to be their political enemies."[4]
References
- ↑ N.Y. attorney general's case tainted by well-documented anti-Trump bias
- ↑ https://youtu.be/g7Zpp-9RYd8?t=623
- ↑ https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/02/trump-attorney-alina-habba-summarizes-status-of-new-york-case-against-trump-business-organization/
- ↑ https://youtu.be/g7Zpp-9RYd8?t=699