Difference between revisions of "Trump v. Anderson"
(Rightly so, Roberts fears that the country could splinter if Leftists are allowed to block Trump from becoming president again.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
A conservative-liberal divide arose on the scope of the ruling. The majority decision, published "per curiam" but probably penned by Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], went further than what was necessary to decide the case. The three [[liberal]] justices squawked about that in a joint opinion, probably written by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], and wanted to leave open the possibility of the federal government disqualifying [[Trump]] from office even if the states cannot exclude him from the ballot. | A conservative-liberal divide arose on the scope of the ruling. The majority decision, published "per curiam" but probably penned by Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], went further than what was necessary to decide the case. The three [[liberal]] justices squawked about that in a joint opinion, probably written by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], and wanted to leave open the possibility of the federal government disqualifying [[Trump]] from office even if the states cannot exclude him from the ballot. | ||
== Fear of Disunity == | == Fear of Disunity == | ||
| − | Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], whose vote [[liberals]] need to prevail on any case, has a fear of disunity that guided his decision in this case and perhaps similar future cases. | + | Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], whose vote [[liberals]] need to prevail on any case, has a fear of disunity that guided his decision in this case and perhaps similar future cases. Roberts justifiably fears that the country could splinter if [[Leftist]]s are allowed to block Trump from becoming president again. |
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 19:47, March 4, 2024
In Trump v. Anderson, the U.S. Supreme Court shut down the Leftist movement to exclude Trump from state ballots in the 2024 Presidential Election. All nine justices agreed with reversing a 4-3 Colorado Supreme Court decision that excluded Trump from the Republican primary ballot there (that decision was stayed pending review by the U.S. Supreme Court).
A conservative-liberal divide arose on the scope of the ruling. The majority decision, published "per curiam" but probably penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, went further than what was necessary to decide the case. The three liberal justices squawked about that in a joint opinion, probably written by Justice Elena Kagan, and wanted to leave open the possibility of the federal government disqualifying Trump from office even if the states cannot exclude him from the ballot.
Fear of Disunity
Chief Justice John Roberts, whose vote liberals need to prevail on any case, has a fear of disunity that guided his decision in this case and perhaps similar future cases. Roberts justifiably fears that the country could splinter if Leftists are allowed to block Trump from becoming president again.