Difference between revisions of "Transgender lawfare"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Here is a growing list of examples: | Here is a growing list of examples: | ||
* On May 10, 2024, “An effort by Nassau County to ban transgender women from competing in women’s sports was struck down by a State Supreme Court judge Friday — a decision County Executive Bruce Blakeman said he will 'absolutely' appeal. ... 'Lack of courage from a Judge who didn’t want to decide the case on its merits. Unfortunately, girls and women are hurt by the Court,' Blakeman said in a statement after the decision.”<ref>https://nypost.com/2024/05/11/us-news/nassau-county-transgender-sports-ban-overturned-by-judge/</ref> | * On May 10, 2024, “An effort by Nassau County to ban transgender women from competing in women’s sports was struck down by a State Supreme Court judge Friday — a decision County Executive Bruce Blakeman said he will 'absolutely' appeal. ... 'Lack of courage from a Judge who didn’t want to decide the case on its merits. Unfortunately, girls and women are hurt by the Court,' Blakeman said in a statement after the decision.”<ref>https://nypost.com/2024/05/11/us-news/nassau-county-transgender-sports-ban-overturned-by-judge/</ref> | ||
| + | * 2016-2023, a seven-year court battle: “I lost sole medical authority. I lost custody. I lost $150,000 in legal costs,” a 32-year-old father said. “But I saved my son” against having [[transgender]] attempts being pushed on him.<ref>https://nypost.com/2024/02/04/metro/dad-claims-ex-wife-forced-young-son-to-transition-despite-his-protests/</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 02:18, May 12, 2024
Transgender lawfare is the very aggressive, lavishly funded misuse of the courts to advance the transgender agenda through lawsuits. There is a new unjust ruling nearly daily now (May 2024) by judicial activism that orders special rights to transgenders, and often to the detriment of many others such as female athletes. These rulings are typically in violation of natural law.
Legislatures, both state and federal, could withdraw jurisdiction from courts to prevent this judicial activism, but have not done so yet. Schools and small businesses that resist the demands by Leftist transgender activists risk being wrongly bankrupted by their lawfare.
Here is a growing list of examples:
- On May 10, 2024, “An effort by Nassau County to ban transgender women from competing in women’s sports was struck down by a State Supreme Court judge Friday — a decision County Executive Bruce Blakeman said he will 'absolutely' appeal. ... 'Lack of courage from a Judge who didn’t want to decide the case on its merits. Unfortunately, girls and women are hurt by the Court,' Blakeman said in a statement after the decision.”[1]
- 2016-2023, a seven-year court battle: “I lost sole medical authority. I lost custody. I lost $150,000 in legal costs,” a 32-year-old father said. “But I saved my son” against having transgender attempts being pushed on him.[2]