Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free trade"
(issues) |
(→Adam Smith is now a Marxist, according to authors of this article) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Conservatives have mixed views on free trade and those views are not some sort of "liberal bias." For example, issues of slave labor in places like China, North Korea, Vietnam and Cuba (and in the old days, the Soviet Union) are serious impediments to free trade with those countries, in the eyes of many social conservatives. Libertarians seldom share these concerns.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:57, 19 August 2009 (EDT) | Conservatives have mixed views on free trade and those views are not some sort of "liberal bias." For example, issues of slave labor in places like China, North Korea, Vietnam and Cuba (and in the old days, the Soviet Union) are serious impediments to free trade with those countries, in the eyes of many social conservatives. Libertarians seldom share these concerns.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 18:57, 19 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Amen to that. It was me trying to highlight the situation of North Korea's Kaesong Industrial Park [http://freekorea.us/?p=5065] that earned me a second year ban at Wikipedia. All I said was, "The workers at Kaesong Industrial Park get more pay and are probably treated with more human dignity than ArbCom treats WP volunteers" (meaning me & MONGO) and whammmo... the banhammer came down for another year. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 20:28, 19 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Adam Smith is now a Marxist, according to authors of this article== | ||
| + | ? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 18:29, January 15, 2025 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh, it was "fixed" by removing completely the [[conservative]] ''[[New American]]'' citation. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 18:45, January 15, 2025 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why the image of [[Adam Smith]]? Is this to imply that Adam Smith was some sort of [[Marxist]] or [[globalist]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 14:35, January 16, 2025 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, January 16, 2025
Conservatives have mixed views on free trade and those views are not some sort of "liberal bias." For example, issues of slave labor in places like China, North Korea, Vietnam and Cuba (and in the old days, the Soviet Union) are serious impediments to free trade with those countries, in the eyes of many social conservatives. Libertarians seldom share these concerns.RJJensen 18:57, 19 August 2009 (EDT)
- Amen to that. It was me trying to highlight the situation of North Korea's Kaesong Industrial Park [1] that earned me a second year ban at Wikipedia. All I said was, "The workers at Kaesong Industrial Park get more pay and are probably treated with more human dignity than ArbCom treats WP volunteers" (meaning me & MONGO) and whammmo... the banhammer came down for another year. Rob Smith 20:28, 19 August 2009 (EDT)
Adam Smith is now a Marxist, according to authors of this article
? RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 18:29, January 15, 2025 (EST)
Oh, it was "fixed" by removing completely the conservative New American citation. [2] RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 18:45, January 15, 2025 (EST)
Why the image of Adam Smith? Is this to imply that Adam Smith was some sort of Marxist or globalist? RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 14:35, January 16, 2025 (EST)
